Thread: Disney
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:04
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Disney good, NASA better-for
Posted by Dan.

Student on team #10, BSM, from Benilde-St. Margaret's and Banner Engineering.

Posted on 10/11/99 10:49 PM MST


In Reply to: Disney good, NASA better- not quite posted by colleen on 10/11/99 10:04 PM MST:



- - - -NASA is big, but not necessary made for TV and hitting all audiences like Disney is.. - - - -

Of course; I was just trying to point out that any locale with a scientific 'motif' serves the purposes of FIRST much better than a theme park. When students can draw relations between their robot and that spaceship overhead it hits home. Mass marketing FIRST doesn't require dumbing it down or making it less effective for its participants. But from the standpoint of logistics and ease, Disney's tough to beat. :-Dan


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.