View Single Post
  #54   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2008, 15:47
StevenB StevenB is offline
is having FRC withdrawal symptoms.
AKA: Steven Bell
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: May 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Stanford, CA
Posts: 412
StevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Beware of R16 your robot design may be too big.

Quote:
with a cylinder whose center point is tangent to the ground and has a base perpendicular to the ground you can have a robot of INFINITE length! however it would only be able to go 40cm high and thats a semicircular shape
As jgannon said earlier, the rule clearly does not allow this (80-inch-diameter upright cylinder).
Quote:
We hope this rule will be STRICTLY enforced.
I would be surprised if this is enforced at all, particularly the cylinder version. The only way to really enforce that would be to catch a robot suspected of breaking the volume, then after the match put the robot in a physical device to measure all the way around the circle - a refereeing nightmare.
Last year's 72" rule was similar, but in practice was only called on robots that had deployed ramps outside the home zone. I saw more than a few arms extending out of the box without penalty.
That said, I don't condone knowingly breaking the rule. GP, rather than the referees, will have to cover this one.
__________________
Need a physics refresher? Want to know if that motor is big enough for your arm? A FIRST Encounter with Physics

2005-2007: Student | Team #1519, Mechanical Mayhem | Milford, NH
2008-2011: Mentor | Team #2359, RoboLobos | Edmond, OK
2014-??: Mentor | Looking for a team...