Thread: 2000 not a new Millenium
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:17
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2000 not a new Millenium
Posted by Dodd Stacy.

Engineer on team #95, Lebanon Robotics Team, from Lebanon High School and CRREL/CREARE.

Posted on 12/20/99 8:20 AM MST


In Reply to: 2000 not a new Millenium posted by Raul on 12/20/99 7:05 AM MST:



So........, the whole confusion is because the AD calendar started with the year '1' rather than '0'? And I heard there was some argument about when the calendar clock was started, as well. I think I'm going to play it safe and celebrate the new millenium both times!

Best of luck to all the teams in the 2000 Games, whatever century and millenium they happen!

Dodd


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.