Thread: Rule M14
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:26
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
I'm with you.
Posted by Daniel.

Coach on team #483, BORG, from Berkeley High School and NASA Ames & UC Berkeley.

Posted on 1/9/2000 7:58 PM MST


In Reply to: Rule M14 posted by Joe Johnson on 1/9/2000 7:20 PM MST:



I am.

However, I don't know that it will be much of an issue. I've been very happy with how graciously proffessional the people in FIRST are. They understand that people need to make changes to help their robot WORK in the heat of competition. I've never once seen a person order another team to be reinspected (though that's not to say it hasn't happened). I have a fealing this rule is a safety to prevent the dramatic. I think this rule is aimed mostly at teams who last year completely changed a part of their robot (while preserving the function), causing a dramatic improvement in performance between the regional and nationals.

Nobody here is mean enough to bust you for keeping your robot from breaking. You know us better than that. =)

-DL


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.