Thread: Scoring ambiguity
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:26
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
I vote for 10
Posted by Joe Johnson.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.

Posted on 1/10/2000 3:17 AM MST


In Reply to: 15 posted by Daniel on 1/9/2000 7:36 PM MST:



Not touching the floor is not the definition of hanging that I took away from Dean & Woodie's presentation.

If a robot is not touching the flat floor it is worth 5 points. So...

Both robots in your example would meet that test, therefore they are worth 5.

If they were not touching the ramp as well as not touching the floor AND were supported by the hanging bar, THEN they would be worth 10, but this is not the situation you described.

Joe J.



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.