View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2008, 11:33
Fred Sayre's Avatar
Fred Sayre Fred Sayre is offline
Registered User
AKA: Fred Sayre
FRC #0488 (xbot)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 141
Fred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant futureFred Sayre has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Fred Sayre
Re: pic: removable electronics

Yes, we changed the board by adding another red block to the distribution block and another 6awg wire. I am flattered that you guys are using our board as a template

I always wanted to clean up the electronics to aid in diagnosing and troubleshooting problems, but what I found is that when you have a clean electronics board, you have much fewer (if any) problems! It solves the problems instead of making them easier to deal with

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikat View Post
The power distribution diagram shows that the 3 breaker panels (one maxi and 2 others) have separate positive wires to the power distribution block. however, the negative terminal from the second breaker panel goes to teh first breaker panel and then into the power distribution block. isn't that a violation of the rule that "All circuit breaker distribution panels must be connected directly to the power
distribution block"?
Good eye! This would seem like a violation to me, but maybe the intent of the rule is only for positive connections? But that seems like a very mixed-message. Ultimately positive and negative routes go through one wire at the battery, and if done right the intermediate connections can be as good as the yellow bridge connections on the power distribution block. Oh well, I still do understand the purpose of the rule though :/
Reply With Quote