Thread: Issues with our code
View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2008, 11:15
Richard McClellan's Avatar
Richard McClellan Richard McClellan is offline
Engineering Mentor
FRC #0254 (Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: May 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 322
Richard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud ofRichard McClellan has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Richard McClellan
Re: Issues with our code
That actually makes a lot of sense now! We got our code working on our new RC (using PWM 1&2), but the old one wasn't working (using PWM 13&15). We didn't originally change the old RC ports because on last year's robot it is very difficult to access and requires unscrewing a lot of electronic components. We're planning on making this year's much easier to access.

Does this mean that we will be limited to 12 PWM ports if we use WPILib? Or is there any way to use 13-16? Right now we're only planning on using 10 PWM ports, so we should be okay, but would we have room to expand to more than 12 ports?
__________________
~ Richard McClellan ~
Former Student on 1477 | Northside Roboteers | 2004-2005
Former Lead Mentor for 2158 | ausTIN CANs | 2007-2010
Current Mentor for 254 | Cheesy Poofs | 2013
Last edited by Richard McClellan : 18-01-2008 at 11:21. Reason: added second paragraph