Thread: Maximum Points
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:38
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: #1 = 60 QP average (Too Low)
Posted by mike aubry.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Engineer on team #47, Chiefs, from Pontiac Central.

Posted on 1/18/2000 8:51 PM MST


In Reply to: #1 = 60 QP average. posted by Raul on 1/18/2000 6:32 AM MST:



: I think the #1 seed will average 60 QP's (20 points for the losing alliance).

: Raul

How hard can it be for 4 robots to get 15 points in balls and then lets assume 1 of the 2 losing robots gets on the ramp. I suppose on average you may be right! And, I just realized that the losing alliances have nothing to gain by getting on the ramp or hanging - so if they get into a no-win situation I'm sure they will just 'back off' rather than score points for the winning alliance and besides why run the risk or get your machine beat on for no good reason. Once the differential is too lopsided the losing alliance may as well just stop running and preserve their machines!


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.