Thread: Maximum Points
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:38
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
I agree - no perfect score (132) this year
Posted by Raul.

Engineer on team #111, Wildstang, from Rolling Meadows & Wheeling HS and Motorola.

Posted on 1/16/2000 10:13 PM MST


In Reply to: Answer me this first... posted by Joe Johnson on 1/16/2000 9:09 PM MST:



As we look back, 1996 and 1999 were relatively easy years to get a perfect score (we were not in it before that). In 1997, it was practically impossible to get the perfect score of 9 x 2 to the 9th power. In 1998, No one got a perfect score but in my opinion it was easier than it will be this year. In 1998 we could do it if the other robots made the wrong moves (we came close once). In 2000 it will require 4 robots hanging and all balls in the goals - in just the right amounts. The odds are incredible. I will eat my ladder-lift if any alliance does it.

Hey Joe, Hats are easy - will you eat your 4x4 translational drive system?

Raul


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.