Thread: Pitfalls of having a "wide" robot?
View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2008, 12:55
Rosiebotboss's Avatar
Rosiebotboss Rosiebotboss is offline
2015-16 Divisional LRI - Archimedes
AKA: Dana P. Henry
FRC #0839 (Rosie Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Agawam, MA
Posts: 854
Rosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Rosiebotboss
Re: Pitfalls of having a "wide" robot?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsonmw04 View Post
thanks for the replies. We have ditched the arms this year and going for a low profile machine. The tallest part of the robot will be the top of the ball. I was concerned with the power needed to turn and the "jumping" while it skids. You have put them to rest. thanks again.

The tallest part of your robot should be the top of the flag holder at 51 inches per <R017>.

http://www.usfirst.org/uploadedFiles...Robot-RevC.pdf
__________________
Co-Founder/Mentor FRC Team 839 / JrFLL Team 137/Rosie Robotics/Agawam HS
Winner NEF District WPI 2016
Regional CA-08 Boston, 12 WPI, Eng'g Excellence, 12-15 UL Safety, 15 Motorola Quality
KPCB Entrepreneurship 04, 05, 06, 07, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16
Rookie All Star and Top Rookie Seed 2002
Paul Harris Fellow, CMP Inspector 05-16, Head LRI NE FIRST JTB 1944-2008 "What did you do with your dash?"