Thread: Consider the following...
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:40
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Fairy Tale
Posted by Bill Beatty.

Other on team #71, Team Hammond, from Team Hammond.

Posted on 1/19/2000 8:08 PM MST


In Reply to: Consider the following... posted by Joe Johnson on 1/17/2000 7:02 PM MST:



Your hypothetical scenario is very unlikely to occur, but I suppose it could happen. It is a good thing you didn't mention any names. That team would have to be a complete klutz.

If your message includes 'look out what you wish for......' you could have a point.

When I brought this subject up last year, my point was not that there was a lot of cheating going on. On the contrary, I truly believe that almost everyone was acting within their interpretation of the rules.

I applaud the clarification of the rules. It was long overdue. The no identical spares rule is a bit of overkill. If someone is inclined to directly violate the rule, then no set of rules is going to correct much of the cheating problem. I feel that allowing identical spares at anytime is fine and let professional ethics take it from there.

Bill B



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.