Thread: Legal fastener for aluminum structural framing question.
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:44
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
fastener vs. structure vs. other stuff
Posted by Ken Patton.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Engineer on team #65, The Huskie Brigade, from Pontiac Northern High School and GM Powertrain.

Posted on 1/21/2000 2:48 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: Or Is It a Fastener? posted by nuts4first on 1/21/2000 2:08 PM MST:



Here's my interpretation:

If you are using the device to connect two structures together to keep them fixed in contact or very close contact with each other, then its a fastening device and is legal.

If you are using the device to hold two structures away from each other, then its a structure and not a fastener (so its not a freebie unless it meets some other rule reqt).

If there is relative motion intended between the two structures, then it is not a fastener (so its not legal unless it meets some other rule reqt).

my two cents..

Ken



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.