View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:49
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sounds okay to me

Posted by Karthik Kanagasabapathy.

Other from Sigh... No Team For Me.

Posted on 1/27/2000 6:23 AM MST


In Reply to: Sounds okay to me posted by Joe Johnson on 1/25/2000 6:52 PM MST:



How about this scenario, a team is winning by more than ten points, they lower their ramp-like device, in an effort to entice their opponent to get on. The winning alliance then receives 3x10 extra points, while the losing team increases their score by 10, which could marginally help if they were on the border of the top 8/16, or make them seem like a more attractive alliance partner.

Since I'm not on a team this year, (I'm suffering through major FIRST withdrawl) I haven't been a part of any strategy discussions. In general are you expecting teams to keep scoring, even if they are losing by an insurmountable amount towards the end of a match. Where is the line between trying better yours and your partner's chances and not adhering to the code of gracious professionalism?

-Karthik


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.