Thread: Best Looking Machines
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:52
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Best Looking Machines
Posted by Ken Wilson.

Engineer on team #248, FEMEX, from Philadelphia Girls High and PECO Energy Company.

Posted on 1/29/2000 5:16 AM MST


In Reply to: Re: Best Looking Machines posted by Mike Sperber on 1/28/2000 6:10 AM MST:



:Well executed and functioning designs are beautiful by
themselves. However, when time permits, a little window-dressing never hurts.

: I do have to agree with you that looks do count!
: But then again, what about 'form, fit, and function'?

: But seriously, looks are important to 'non-FIRST' people; however, the machines all look interesting and inviting, regardless of if you know what they are.

: But more importantly in trying to increase the interest in FIRST of non-FIRST related people, is how they are treated by everyone (engineers, teachers, students) when they are looking around the pits and watching the matches.




__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.