View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:53
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bumper issues (short and simple)

Posted by Scott Strickland.

Engineer on team #21, ComBBAT, from Astronaut & Titusville High School and Boeing/NASA.

Posted on 1/28/2000 8:34 PM MST


In Reply to: Bumper issues (long & complex) posted by Joe Johnson on 1/28/2000 5:35 PM MST:



I think you have to look at the context in which the question was asked. The rules look unchanged to me.

They asked if they could use a smaller bumper than the envelope and if it could be positioned at the bottom of the envelope. Answer: Yes and No.

The bumper must fit within the envelope specified by the original rules. If it is smaller, it must be on the centerline of the envelope specified. It must be removable. It must be stationary (and be on a 'fixed' portion of your robot).

The material of the bumper can be anything (I think even stuff not allowed for the rest of the robot), but it counts against you for weight. Anvils are usually very heavy!

Anyway, that's the way I see it. I guess it's not so short and simple after all.

Scott
Team 21 ComBBAT


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.