View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-01-2008, 10:15
Tytus Gerrish's Avatar
Tytus Gerrish Tytus Gerrish is offline
IGAB, ADHD, and Dislexic
AKA: Ty
FRC #0179 (SwampThing)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,017
Tytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Legalality of pnumatic ball launcher systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
I'm curious as to if you can depressurize an end of the cyllinder such that it's actually less than atmospheric pressure, theoretically achieving the same results but also technically within legality of all of the Q&A answers. Depressurisation would be achieved in a similar (but reversed) manner to what's described.
My thoughts exactly. is that allowed through R87?

however i haven't tried this for myself yet and weather or not it works is still a mystery to me. prehaps someone else could tell us about their oun experment in this thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tytus Gerrish View Post
i suppose if a cylinder were plunged in the opposite fashion in order to pull a vacuum while cocked, this would not apply to R93 as pneumatic pressure is not being generated, rather a vacuum is being pulled in the empty space and then the device is allowed due to R87