View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-01-2008, 12:17
Qbranch Qbranch is offline
wow college goes fast.
AKA: Alex
FRC #1024 (Kil-A-Bytes)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,174
Qbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ultrasonic Range Finder

Quote:
Originally Posted by barstow View Post
We put the vex ultrasonic sensor on our bot for some tests,
Well, we tried the vex ultrasonics once and never had a whole lot of success with them. As i mentioned above, and as is mentioned just above this post, the Parallax PING))) sensor is a very robust option.

Round (cylindrical, parabolic, spherical) objects can be viewed from any angle since the wave from the ultrasonic sensor (which is a section of a sphere in shape) can find a perfect tangent point from any angle to the round object. For example, if you wanted to... say... find a pipe... (have no idea why you want to do that ) it looks the same from any side (since there aren't really any sides to a circular surface).

What you say is true for flat objects. Within a narrow margin of off-axis, ultrasonics measure fine. But as you go off axis your measurements are distorted then soon disappear. That's we use a number of different schemes of data processing/collection from multiple ultrasonic sensors depending on the situation to get reliable data (this lead to the development of the aforementioned quad-ultrasonic driver) As a hint, one of these incudes mounting the ultrasonic sensor on an airplane servo.

Questions, Post!

-q
__________________
Electrical Engineer Illini
1024 | Programmer '06, '07, '08 | Driver '08