View Single Post
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2008, 15:40
Joe G.'s Avatar
Joe G. Joe G. is online now
Taking a few years (mostly) off
AKA: Josepher
no team (Formerly 1687, 5400)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 1,447
Joe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe G. has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Joe G.
Re: pic: Team 1114 Teaser

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1219forlife View Post
I am going to go with that the mentors designed and built them another robot..... and i can gaurantee it. You all know its true.
Just because they turn out great robots year after year dosen't mean that they have mentors and engineers doing everything. *Gasp* maybe the mentors are....mentoring, guiding and teaching the students how to design and build great robots. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion on this, as the "student run" thing is not written down anywhere in the FRC rules, but I believe that, as long as both the students and mentors are learning and having fun, and the students understand the robot as well as the mentors, the team is being run the right way.

When I was in FLL as a student for six years, there were a few teams (not going to name names) who would almost always win in performance at our regional, because college engineering teachers built their robot. I was dissappointed in not winning, not because we were being beaten, but because we were being beaten by a team whose students clearly only had a vague understanding of their own robot. This isn't right.

Last year, I graduated from FLL student, and went on to mentor another FLL team. I swore to myself going into it that I would not put my hand on the robot once. I succeded in following this. However, the team's "student only" policy restricted me much more than that. Ideas were thrown out for the sole reason "Joe supports this, it isn't following the student-only policy." I spent 98% of the meeting time firing blow-darts at the wall. Only when the students were absolutely desperate was I called on to help. This isn't right either.

The mentors are there to teach. If the students aren't learning, and the mentors are just locked in the shop building without any input, than that isn't good. But if the students are learning from those with experience, and by the end of the season know the robot inside and out, know why everything is the way it is, have learned about engineering, and most importantly, are inspired to follow in their mentor's footsteps, then everything is fine, even if mentors are operating all the mills.
__________________
FIRST is not about doing what you can with what you know. It is about doing what you thought impossible, with what you were inspired to become.

2007-2010: Student, FRC 1687, Highlander Robotics
2012-2014: Technical Mentor, FRC 1687, Highlander Robotics
2015-2016: Lead Mentor, FRC 5400, Team WARP
2016-???: Volunteer and freelance mentor-for-hire

Last edited by Joe G. : 03-02-2008 at 15:58.
Reply With Quote