Quote:
Originally Posted by ldeffenb
We've already done this, but why the recommendation to "reset after processing...other...data"? We simply remember the last count and make sure it has changed before processing more data. That way we are sure to be processing fresh stuff and don't need to tie it all together to get a reset when everyone has had their chance at the latest readings....
Lynn (D) - Team Voltage 386 Software
|
Yes, this works too, but keep in mind that the value returned by ADC_Result_Count will roll over at some point, so make sure to use the != operator instead of > in your test (I know you know this Lynn; I'm just mentioning this so others won't make a mistake).
-Kevin