View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-02-2008, 09:03
ajlapp ajlapp is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anthony Lapp
None #0118 (Team RUSH and Robonauts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Ortonville, MI
Posts: 648
ajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond repute
Re: DeWalt Transmission Problem

Yes, removing the pins will allow the transmission to easily back-drive. But that isn't necessarily a bad thing.

A common practice is to counter-balance your arm, then use a pot or encoder as a feedback signal. Software can then understand the arm/joint location and use the motor to keep the structure located in space.

There are many examples of this on chief....a tag search for "arm" should give many examples of how teams have previously built arm-like systems.

This RUSH Bot from 2005.....you can see the gas springs on the lower joint that help counter-balance the weight of the arm system.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/20302

Chiefdelphi from 2000 using gas springs as counter-balance and dampers.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/12954
__________________
Anthony Lapp
FIRST Engineering Mentor
Owner/Operator 221 Robotic Systems
221 Robotics Systems - Quality Hardware, Made in the USA
RobotOpen
anthony@221robotics.com
Twitter us: @221RobotSystems
Team 1 --> 94 --> 68 --> 221 --> 857 --> 27 --> 118
Design Engineer/Fabricator and 17 year vet
Team Rush (FRC27) and Robonauts (FRC118)

Last edited by ajlapp : 13-02-2008 at 09:10.