Thread: 130lbs to 140lbs.
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:11
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Not a chance...
Posted by Lora Knepper.

Student on team #69, HYPER (Helping Youth Pursue Engineering & Robotics), from Quincy Public Schools and The Gillette Company.

Posted on 3/1/2000 7:17 AM MST


In Reply to: Not a chance... posted by Joe Johnson on 3/1/2000 5:01 AM MST:



Joe,

I understand where Anton is coming from here. Though I agree with you that for this year, the limit should and will remain the same, perhaps FIRST can look into an allowance for next year. With the weight of the battery and light, required elements that we can do nothing about, there should be an allowance for those elements, rather than be hurt by them. Just my 2 cents. Anyone else have a say?

__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.