View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:22
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Two Different Games

Posted by Chris.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Coach on team #308, Walled Lake Monster, from Walled Lake Schools and TRW Automotive Electronics.

Posted on 3/16/2000 5:46 AM MST


In Reply to: Re: Two Different Games posted by S. Krussell on 3/15/2000 6:31 PM MST:



: Well Chris, I don't think i agree with you on that. If the elimination teams were picked based on the seeding rounds, then a lot of good teams will also be left behind. It's not about the points.

I agree with everything you say. What I meant was that the seeding rounds should (perhaps) be scored differently such that it predicts success in the eliminations. I still like the idea of picking partners. Joe hit the nail on the head below with the baseball analogy. Keeping with his analogy, my point was that I would rather see us use the win/loss record in baseball rather than total successful bunts. (In other words, there is little correlation between bunting and winning the World Series, so why use it to determine who makes the playoffs?) Last year's system wasn't perfect, but I believe it had more correlation to success in the eliminations than this year's system.

As a side note, I don't want anything to change this year (I hate rule changes once competitions begin).


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.