Thread: Nationals a la NCAA
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:24
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: I like it....eh.....
Posted by Michael.

Student on team #188, The Blizzard, from Woburn Collegiate Institute and Ontario Power Generation.

Posted on 3/16/2000 3:23 PM MST


In Reply to: I like it posted by Joe Johnson on 3/16/2000 2:53 PM MST:



But there are flaws eh?..I had to throw that 'eh' in...For example, all the so-called 'good' teams could be put in one division, and the final four could be between a super good alliance, and 3 not-so-super-good alliances, right? And you still would have to scout other teams, because the winners of each division would have to scout for potential ally's anyways...Besides, scouting is fun, isn't it?

Mike

: Chris,

: I like it.

: Teams could be randomly divided into A, B, C, & D groups. A's always play A's etc.

: In this way teams would only have to scout 70 teams -- manageable.

: I don't think that FIRST would devote each stage to specific groups because then one group would always be out in the sun :-(. But perhaps a rotation could be arranged. For instance, groups could all play on the same stage for rounds 1 & 2 but then switch for 3 & 4 and switch again fro 5 & 6, etc.

: Actually, I think that this proposal helps make FIRST more TV friendly and therefore I think it should be adopted this year if possible.

: One additional benefit is that it would also give teams a natural alliance to cheer for in the Final Four, thus keep more people invovled in the outcome of the Finals.

: I see only upside to this proposal.

: Other thoughts?

: Joe J.



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.