View Single Post
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-02-2008, 12:23
David Brinza's Avatar
David Brinza David Brinza is offline
Lead Mentor, Lead Robot Inspector
FRC #0980 (ThunderBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 1,379
David Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond repute
Re: My comments on shooters

"Robots will have to be built robustly to avoid damage from falling Trackballs."
-- 2008 Overdrive Animation.

There are non-shooting robots that can drop a Trackball more than 10' (Team 294: front and center!). An eight pound ball dropped from that height can do some serious damage. Balls dropped from that height can also careen off the field. Safety concerns about the kinetic energy of Trackballs will involve more than shooters.

I think the bigger concern is the risk of the shooter mechanism itself. Teams with shooters need to consider the effects of various failure modes (i.e. suppose this bolt comes loose, what if this bracket gets bent, and so on) and design accordingly. Team members should be prepared to tell the inspectors what fail-safe provisions are included to avoid injury to team members and people NOT familiar with the robot (referees, alliance partners, field reset, etc.). If your robot is a shooter, your "Release Safety Officer" should expect to get grilled on the contents of Update 5. Inspectors will not give much lattitude to a team that hasn't paid attention to safety considerations in their design.
__________________
"There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it over."
2003 AZ: Semifinals, Motorola Quality; SoCal: Q-finals, Xerox Creativity; IRI: Q-finals
2004 AZ: Semifinals, GM Industrial Design; SoCal: Winners, Leadership in Controls; Championship: Galileo #2 seed, Q-finals; IRI: Champions
2005 AZ: #1 Seed, Xerox Creativity; SoCal: Finalist, RadioShack Controls; SVR: Winners, Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technologies"; Championship: Archimedes Semifinals; IRI: Finalist
2007 LA: Finalist; San Diego: Q-finals; CalGames: Finalist || 2008 San Diego: Q-finals; LA: Winners; CalGames: Finalist || 2009 LA: Semifinals; Las Vegas: Q-finals; IRI: #1 Seed, Finalist
2010 AZ: Motorola Quality; LA: Finalist || 2011 SD: Q-finals; LA: Q-finals || 2013 LA: Xerox Creativity, WFFA, Dean's List Finalist || 2014 IE: Q-finals, LA: Finalist, Dean's List Finalist
2016 Ventura: Q-finals, WFFA, Engineering Inspiration
Reply With Quote