Thread: Alliances in touble?
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:46
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How about this? Another solution!
Posted by James Jones.

Engineer on team #267, The Demolition Squad, from North Broward & St Andrews and Motorola.

Posted on 4/12/2000 11:00 AM MST


In Reply to: How about this? posted by P.J. Baker on 4/12/2000 9:58 AM MST:



Dare I say it? How about bigger playing fields and 3 team alliances? Statisticly you have less of a chance of getting extra good or extra bad alliances during seeding. Now 4 teams are in each alliance in the elliminations so more people are invested in the outcome. You also increase the throughput capacity of the fields and might make the game even more entertaining. Just don't ask me to coach.



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.