Thread: Define "ROBOT"
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2008, 23:23
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,135
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: Define "ROBOT"

You don't need a new definition, the ones present are adequate. Their two configurations/two robots didn't pass inspection as such, and as such do not count as a robot.

I'm not going to comment on whether or not the decision not to pass them is right or wrong, that's the subject of the other thread. However, since they collectively did NOT pass inspection, they collectively do not count as a robot, by the definition presented.
__________________
Reply With Quote