View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:58
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
New Poll? Or at least discussion...

Posted by Ryan Shanley.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Student on team #191, The X-Cats, from Joseph C. Wilson Magnet High School and Xerox.

Posted on 5/2/2000 2:27 PM MST



I would love to see a pole regarding this year's new addition to the game: that the winning alliance gets three times the losers' score. I must admit it added a new demension to the strategy of the 2000 game, but it wasn't applicable in the most important matches, the finals.

So I've been wondering (since many of my team-mates and I have been discussing it) how people feel about the overall influence and/or consequences of adding this nuance to the game, and if it should be kept (or even improved upon), or if Dean should just get rid of it?
I'd love to know how you feel, and maybe we can get a poll started on this.
Ryan


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.