[EricH]

I took a good, close look at the GDC's response. I examined every rule referenced. The only rule that might be broken, as the rules are written, is the definition of Robot, which is ambiguous at best when examined.

In my opinion, 1519 built ONE robot with TWO configurations. (One was a drivebase, the other was a drivebase with an arm.)

I'm pretty sure that "ROBOT" will be clearly defined next year. Otherwise, the first question the Q&A gets should be, "Please clarify the definition of Robot, as it is currently circular."