Thread: Yeah- what exactly is meant by 'best'?
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:10
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Yeah- what exactly is meant by 'best'?
Posted by colleen.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Coach on team #246, a FIRST-aholic, from John D. O'Byrant High School/Boston Latin Academy and NSTAR/Boston University/UTC/Raytheon/MassPEP.

Posted on 6/6/2000 9:01 PM MST



In this talk about 'best' robot and 'top tens'.. please no one get offended by the lists..

to me.. when i name robots in my 'top ten' it's not just particularly the robot that can do it all, do it the fastest, etc.. the best robots are the Quality robots.. simply, they do what they are built to do with efficiency..

efficiency = repeatability... being able to do what you do well, over and over again, despite who your partner is..

with alliances the way they are, there are many teams who seeded high because they had many good partners.. however, there are a good bunch that did well and proved the quality of their 'bots whether or not their partner was 'good' or even on the field.. those are the robots i think are top ten material..

you build a robot to perform a certain task.. and you go out their every match and complete that task to the highest of your ability.. quality robot.. 'best' robot.. those make the top ten on my list..

'nother thing.. sure it's true that you tend to 'notice' teams from your area more.. after all, they are close by, often your friend teams.. and that's true of any area (midwest, northeast, mid-atlantic, etc..).. but i really don't think people pick teams based on that.. or that counts anyone out.. i spent 4 years on a team with an -extensive- strategy setup.. they track every team in every match they play.. and know details on every team based on that (including scouting other regionals.. i myself went to 2 chicago regionals and the first one in Texas).. consequently... our alliance choices last year were from NH and NJ.. and this year, their partners were as well.. not based on state or area but on quality of robot and compliance as a partner...

i know some teams that choose partners based on who their sponsor is or the like.. but respectably enough most teams try and pick the robot best suited to partner with them.. unfortunately, not all of us, no matter where we are from, are best suited for any of those top 16 teams.. it's the 'unfairness' built into the game..

someone's gotta lose..

.. but good thing we're in FIRST and their are no losers ;-)


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.