Thread: What else do we want?
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:17
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
How about modification to allow limited tape...
Posted by Joe Johnson.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.

Posted on 6/27/2000 3:41 PM MST


In Reply to: Duct Tape!! posted by Lora Knepper on 6/22/2000 3:01 PM MST:



I think that a rule modification that would allow tape as long as it is not in view is overdue.

I have heard that Woodie is sort of an anti-duct tape zealot, but I think that the competition has progressed to the point that we can allow the use of tape without fear of machines totally taped together.

I think it would be reasonable to allow tape but only if it is not visible during the operation of the machine.

This addresses the cosmetic concerns I think FIRST worried about without tieing our hands when a piece of double sided tape is the right answer for the job.

Thoughts?

Joe J.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.