View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:19
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Figure 2.1 -absolute or example?

Posted by Nate Smith.

Other on team #66, GM Powertrain/Willow Run HS, from Eastern Michigan University and GM Powertrain.

Posted on 7/16/2000 3:09 PM MST


In Reply to: Figure 2.1 is clear posted by Ken Patton on 7/11/2000 3:27 PM MST:



: As I said in my post, Figure 2.1 is pretty explicit. It, along with the wording in the rules and updates, doesn't leave any room for changes.

My understanding of Figure 2.1 in the rules is that is was an example of how things could be wired. After all, it was not required that a separate panel be used for distributing ground, nor were the panels required at all(the breakers could be wired directly inline[with spade connectors for example].) So, the fact that a 3x30 breaker setup inline between the power distribution panels and 60A fuse is not shown in the diagram would not appear to be grounds for it not being able to be used.

Also, when looking over the rules, the only ones I can find regarding the use of the breakers is that they must be used with certain motors. There appears to be nothing saying that they may not be used in other cases, such as the 3x30 combination...

Just my 2 cents..

Nate


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.