Quote:
Originally Posted by Katy
[This is another anonymously coauthored post]
Last there was a post entitled "Why is anybody surprised at ref problems." This post was posted by a user under a second account. Since this is banned by CD rules the account was deleted and eventually the thread was also removed.
...
|
I would find that excuse credible if you could explain the existence of these
anonymous accounts. There is obviously a double standard. Some are allowed, even
celebrated, while others are quick to receive a friendly reminder that the practice is prohibited.
Don’t bother trying to reconcile the two; it is obviously the content that gets a thread deleted. I wish everyone would quit trying to insult our intelligence by suggesting otherwise, or by objecting about the author’s secret identity when it’s the content that puts him or her off.
So what about the content of the OP? Does a person who has worked so hard deserve to be dragged through the mud because of a few words said in anger and frustration? I don’t think so. I think deletion was the right thing to do the first time, the second time, and this time too!