[waialua359]

Originally Posted by Rosiebotboss

4. In my first conversation with Aidan after the game was revealed at SNHU, I asked why a game without any defense. He told me, that is what the teams wanted. Over the past 2 years the referees and the GDC were getting hammered with compaints about rough play, so the GDC decided to give the teams what they wanted, or what they thought they wanted, a game without defense. A game in which NO contact was allowed (outside the bumper zone.) So, I tell you this to illustrate that the GDC and the "makers of the magic" do listen and do care. Believe it or not, Dr. Browne is on your side.

I have to agree with this one. What we dont tell rookie teams especially, is that not only do you have to build a robot to meet the game challenge, but you have to be able to handle "rough" play/defense that will try and prevent you from doing the game task(s). This was especially true last year. Only the most experienced drivers and robust robots were able to overcome with greater success robots that tried to stop them from scoring.
I have spoken with so many Hawaii rookie teams already that think all they have to worry about is trying to hurdle as if they were the only team on the field. They will be in for a rude awakening on the game speed, dynamics of 6 teams on the field, and defensive play.
I like the rule changes towards allowing teams to play the game.

BUT, this thread has several tangents and is beyond the nature of the game design. Its also about referees having adequate knowledge of the game, being consistent, and open to concerns graciously brought forth by teams both during the matches, competition and after. I have no strong opinions about either side, but only to say, its unfortunate when scores do not correctly reflect the scores it's supposed to be. Whatever solutions come about to improve on this, we all want the same thing.
I look forward to watching and participating in regional matches during weeks 4-6 and lets be optimistic things will go well.