View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:32
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
The Truth

Posted by Splash.

Student on team #53, Team Inferno, from Eleanor Roosevelt High School and NASA GSFC.

Posted on 8/7/2000 2:33 PM MST


In Reply to: QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!! posted by Andy Grady on 8/6/2000 9:04 AM MST:



: Question 8/6/00: Since the forming of alliances, teams have been shopping around their robots by using pamphlets, signs, websites, etc... Do you think that these methods actually help a teams chances in getting picked?


I doubt it. One team made an impression on us, the RoboDawgs. We actually went and looked at their robot. Most teams pamphlets went on top of the cabinet though. But I don't think that the pamphlets do much good. They may remind some people about a robot they know is good but forgot about. I think people should pass them out in the stands if they want to be more effective. Having the specs as the robot performs in front of you might give you insight to why to robot is at its level.

I know our team's flier was a stretch. It said what we could do, carry 4 balls, etc., but it didn't say anything about our low speed/low power.

No one will base their pick solely on a pamphlet. But they might look at a team with an impressive flier.

__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.