Thread: The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals.
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:34
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
not in huge favor...but can see the good points
Posted by Lora Knepper.

Other on team #419, Rambots, from UMass Boston / BC High and NASA, Mathsoft, Solidworks, Analog Devices.

Posted on 8/15/2000 6:20 PM MST


In Reply to: The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals. posted by Joe Johnson on 8/15/2000 7:02 AM MST:



I was never one that liked the idea of 'regionalizing' the Nationals...the size of the competition was always something that set the Nats apart from Regionals in my mind...both great for their own reason.

But...I also see the need to put a 'cap' somewhere. I just don't like the idea of geographic separation, or sponsor for that matter. Probably the best way to divide the Nats in my mind is totally random... yes there are pros and cons to that, but geographic separation makes it just another regional, and sponsor separation brings the focus on the money factor.

Just my thoughts...

Lora


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.