Thread: The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals.
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:35
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Got it... (IMO) positives explained
Posted by Nate Smith.

Other on team #66, GM Powertrain/Willow Run HS, from Eastern Michigan University and GM Powertrain.

Posted on 8/17/2000 11:13 AM MST


In Reply to: Got it... (IMO) positives explained posted by Andy Baker on 8/15/2000 10:11 PM MST:



: 3. This enables more teams to make it to the finals

My view on the decision in '99 to not have all teams advance to the finals is that FIRST is attempting to prepare us for the year that not all teams are allowed to go to nationals, based on regional performance or some other criteria. So, while I admit that it is frustrating to have a good performance and then get overlooked for elims, it's my opinion that any attempt to solve this by simply allowing more teams to advance would be a step in the wrong direction.

Nate
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.