[JesseK]

This year, 1885 going to Atlanta is not only stressful on our funds, but also stressful on our time. We have something we're doing in addition to FRC and it hits the weekend after Atlanta. We have an idea of how we're going to pull it off and we just gotta stick to the schedule.

Motivated by our Engineering Inspiration Award win at VCU, most of the students got together over their Spring Break to do a bit of fundraising. The funds they raised that day were about 5% of the total cost...not much, but every bit helps. They also have alot of approvals for donations of things they can raffle. I'm not sure exactly what these things are, but the raffle itself can take place after Atlanta and tickets may be sold immediately.

A grant idea is a decent idea in some respects. At most, I would say any grant should cover the registration fee and no more. The paradox is that if your team really is inspiring the local students, community, and businesses then funds to go to the championships shouldn't be that hard to acquire if you put forth the effort. I've said it before and I'll say it again: the community that supports an activity will pay for that activity. Just look at the football team. However, in more rural communities where sponsors are sparse I may understand the sentiment of having an allowed grant. The question is...where do you draw the line? What exactly would qualify a team for this grant?

Do we allow teams with large fundraising opportunities in their community to simply slack and take the easier road of applying for a grant? It is my opinion that we do not. If the team does not go out and advertise their success, they will be hard-pressed to get support from the community. If they don't have support for their community, how can you tell that the team is truely trying to change the culture to be more aligned with sci/tech? It's a tough call I think.