Thread: 1vs3 What would you do?
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2008, 22:26
Liz Smith's Avatar
Liz Smith Liz Smith is online now
believes in robots
AKA: Pika1579
FRC #3940
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 386
Liz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond reputeLiz Smith has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Liz Smith
Re: 1vs3 What would you do?
Quote:
Originally Posted by arhajder View Post
I hate this situation with a passion. Last year it happened to us so many times. Teams feel like there not going to playoffs and decide to quit. I think its Un-Gracious Professionalism on their part. But you gotta do what you gotta do.
I think the situation Alex is describing is a bit different than the one you're describing. None of the teams "quit" and ended up hurting their own alliance. In this case it was the elimination rounds and the referees only allowed one team to play on the blue alliance for that particular match. It was due to the rules about timeouts this year and teams being required to be on the field by the end of their timeout. The GP discussion comes in with whether the one team alliance and/or the 3 team alliance should play to their full potential in this particular situation.
__________________
Alumna of 555 Mentor of 3940
Volunteering since 2004: Say hi to me at events!
Applications Engineer
AndyMark, Inc.
Last edited by Liz Smith : 30-03-2008 at 22:35. Reason: Some clarification
Reply With Quote