Thread: Scoring for No-Shows
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:54
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Scoring for No-Shows
Posted by Nate Smith.

Other on team #66, GM Powertrain/Willow Run HS, from Eastern Michigan University and GM Powertrain.

Posted on 9/28/2000 5:09 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: Scoring for No-Shows posted by David Kelso on 9/28/2000 2:26 PM MST:



: This is really one of the most important topics that we need to discuss. FIRST is for everyone, no one wants to see a team penalized for not fielding a robot, and everyone knows the feeling that goes with having their robot not work properly on the field.

In some cases, however, having a broken ally gives your team more of a chance to get noticed by teams scouting for possible allies. In Florida last year, our ally had their machine on the field, but it basically just sat there, and we still ended up winning by about 15 points...

Nate
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.