Thread: The Aggressive Placebo
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 23:54
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
The Aggressive Placebo
Posted by Andy Grady.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Other on team in limbo from in limbo sponsored by in limbo.

Posted on 9/29/2000 11:23 AM MST



Here is a little brainchild I have had with the purpose of solving the robot no-show problems, tell me what yout think...
Now many of us who have been around for many years remember (and love) the Placebo. For those of you who weren't around the Placebo was a robot made by first that just drove around the field doing basically nothing in order to fill the gaps in seeding rounds and the elimination tornement. With Alliances the Placebo was no longer needed, however the missing robots from teams who were having problems still appeared thus leaving some teams with just one robot in a match. Of course the system doesn't always work to the advantage of those teams who were left to fend for themselves alone against 2 other robots. I say, what if First could create an agressive placebo. This would literally be a 130lb box on wheels with medium speed and power. What would then happen is when a team is forced to no show, the team would send a driver and a human player out to the field. The driver would control the agressive placebo for the match allowing them to at least play a little defense for the alliance. Then I figure give the team who no showed 1/3rd of the qualification points of that team. Reason being of course to still give teams a reason to get a robot out there. Of course this is not a flawless system, but its an idea.
peace out,
Andy Grady


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.