View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 00:01
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!!

Posted by Erin.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Other on team ? from ? sponsored by ?.

Posted on 10/11/2000 9:34 AM MST


In Reply to: QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!! posted by Andy Grady on 10/9/2000 7:38 AM MST:



Personally, I think that more relaxed rules with materials are the key to having a wide variety of robot designs and we see robots with a wide array of capabilities as well. I believe that the rules for 2000 were very open-ended, however, we all know that it could change from year-to-year. I think that I would like to see SMC put some more pneumatics up in the kit. I think that it would really expand everyone's horizons to be able to incorporate pnuematics devices more into the design and operation of their robot. Although sometimes heavy, expensive, and sometimes hard to work with, I would love to see how the hundereds of different teams would utilize them in design.

I have a good question for next week Andy- how many of you people used the pneumatics on your robot and what exactly did they function as? was their performace reliable? would you use them again? are they efficient? did the students work well with them?
I'd like to know.

-Erin



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.