Thread: QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!!
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 00:07
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
I'm on Joe's side
Posted by Mike Kulibaba.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Other on team #88, TJē, from Bridgewater-Raynham Regional and Depuy, a Johnson and Johnson Company.

Posted on 10/16/2000 7:52 PM MST


In Reply to: Nationals Outdoors Again Please!! posted by Lora Knepper on 10/16/2000 7:05 PM MST:



I have to agree with Joe that I think the 3 arenas they had inside were a big step forward and it was a good trial and error period. But what if they make that tent wider on all sides and put seating on all 4 sides of each arena. If you have seating on all 4 sides it would allow for more people to watch the event and not be so crowded. But they would need alot of seats on each side. I don't know how many but I think it could work. but I enjoyed being inside, it was crowded and there wasn't enough seats but I liked it better.

Kuli Team 88



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.