|
Re: Intentionally Losing Matches
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK
... it'd backfire if the #1 seed recognises that it was your team that caused the alliance to lose.
|
Already covered in the scenario I described to create a solid foundation for the discussion.
Quote:
|
I'd like to point out that Blake's posts here are NOT 1885's strategic, practical, or otherwise viewpoint(s). ...
|
Already made clear in a previous message I posted. I suppose it is wise to repeat that info again here: Remember, these are my personal opinions. I enjoy assisting several teams near my home and their members all have widely varying responses to this question. Plus, I think it is a very nice topic for a challenging debate. Intense, non-personal debate is healthy.
Quote:
|
If a hypothetical team has the opportunity to be in the top 8 yet has not done the legwork to scout other teams that have the chance to topple the #1 seed, ...
|
Already covered in the scenario I described to create a solid foundation for the discussion.
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
Last edited by gblake : 04-08-2008 at 10:48 PM.
|