View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 00:10
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: I'll watch your back!

Posted by Mike Aubry.

Engineer on team #47, Chiefs, from Pontiac Central and Delphi .

Posted on 10/19/2000 10:06 PM MST


In Reply to: I KNEW this kind of thing would happen! posted by Joe Johnson on 10/19/2000 5:37 PM MST:



: Is is too late to change my answers to my own questions?

: I have GOT to get more sleep?

: Let me be the first to point out that 206 is NOT a possible Q-point score.

: I will not hazard another answer at this point.
The best score possible is 108 to 45, this equates to 198 q-pts for the winning team and 99 q-pts for the losing team. Winning team ramps = 1 yellow(10)and the rest as normal scores 1,3,3,5,5 in each, and the doubler. The other team ramps are filled, only one yellow ball left - so its in one of the 1pt spots. The q-pts are then calculated winner score plus double the losers (108+90) and the losers is 45 + 54. Hope i'm right!
: Any other takers?

: Joe J.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.