[Lil' Lavery]

Leaving out the discussion of whether it's actually a problem that the #1 seeds are winning, which is another massive debate in itself, I don't think it's because the offensive nature of the game entirely. While 2007 may or may have more success from lower seeds (our 2007 Champs were #8 seeds), I'd bet (and will try to prove once I have free time) that even more #1 seeds won in 2006. With the nature of the Aim High game, a 2 shooter/1 defender alliance was very very successful, and while a few defenders excelled, you could typically get a very worthy defender at the last pick of the draft. It's not the offensive nature of games, it's just the way the games play out.