View Single Post
  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2008, 03:12
Chicago1st Chicago1st is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9
Chicago1st has much to be proud ofChicago1st has much to be proud ofChicago1st has much to be proud ofChicago1st has much to be proud ofChicago1st has much to be proud ofChicago1st has much to be proud ofChicago1st has much to be proud ofChicago1st has much to be proud of
Re: FIRST has $8 Million?!? What did I miss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricVanWyk View Post
Situations vary between NPOs, but a vague rule of thumb is to keep a quarter of your annual throughput on hand, "minimum". After reading half a tree worth of horror stories of NPOs that tanked due to insufficient reserves, I'm glad FIRST has a bit in the bank.

Lastly, before we lambaste FIRST for this, lets all take a moment and look at the reserves universities keep and the rates they charge for tuition. I won't say the two are apples and apples, but it is a similar concept.
For what it's worth, FIRST is a "non-profit", no doubt about that, but I do agree with David Noll that they are run like a business much more than most in FIRST are aware. That is mostly good by the way, but also brings some of the negatives of business behavior and ethics with it.

I agree with you Eric that a solid foundation should keep around 25% of their operating expenses in reserve. Problem is, FIRST had a cash reserve between 25-29% in 2002 & 2003. Then the registration fees were increased and the profit/cash in reserve went up to 33%, 35%, 40% and 42% from 2004-2007.

I'm sorry, but here's where I will somewhat "lambaste" FIRST a bit, as you but it. Where I started to have a problem with the financial status of FIRST. If they were a business and I owned stock, I'd be all for it. But it's a non profit, and I got involved because I thought it was a great program for schools and students. Then I see the non-profit generating $1-2 Million in extra revenue (profit) each year from team fees even after they've secured a cash nest egg of over 33% of their operating expenses. At the same time I see teams struggling to participate, many can't because it's too expensive and I haven't really seen the quality of the program increase with the increased revenue.

I'm going to stop, because I get worked up and upset with FIRST every time I delve into the fee structure and the business ethics, or lack of, in instances like the FLL-FTC relationship. I am troubled by the direction of FIRST, but I love the program - or at least the program I thought it was and know it was a a few years ago. Just wish it was managed like a non-profit trying to follow it's great mission, not a business trying to increase it's bottom line at the expense of it's customers. Sorry, just my frustrated view right now.
Reply With Quote