|
Re: Galileo Division 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunshine
This thread has been very entertaining to watch. There also seems to be a lot of chest pounding  and politicking going on. Some of you make it appear that the other divisions should just stay home.
Spend some time on other threads talking about other alliances and you'll obviously get a different perspective about everyones chances.
My two observations would be:
Watch out for the dark horses. Many of you have already declared your picks without considering other good robots who have quietly done well this year. Although prescouting is fun and possibly rewarding, continual scouting will be very important in Atlanta. How many teams have come up with plans to improve their robots? How many teams have less stellar robots than you predict because the toll of doing multiply regionals have taken a hit on the structural integrity of their robot? How many teams have strategized great defense maneuvers to compliment good offense?
My second observation may be a sensitive bias because we are a second year team. But do not rule out teams that happen to have numbers above 2000. There always appears to be an underlying notion that only teams who have been around for several years will do well. You may be setting yourself up for a disappointment because you did not look at other teams strictly because of their assigned number.
|
Oh, there's a lot of teams that keep a low profile and do their "talking" on the field. We all know that the serious scouts are looking at teams' performance (including their own) on the field and how each team might complement (or neutralize) each other.
As far as second year teams, Exploding Bacon made it to Einstein last year. They were the "real deal". Experienced scouts give team number just a little more consideration than color of the robot when it comes to evaluating a team's capability.
This thread is supposed to be entertaining and some of the entertainment comes from watching team members "position" themselves. Keep in mind, almost nobody will be referring to this thread when alliance selection time is near...
__________________
"There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it over."
2003 AZ: Semifinals, Motorola Quality; SoCal: Q-finals, Xerox Creativity; IRI: Q-finals
2004 AZ: Semifinals, GM Industrial Design; SoCal: Winners, Leadership in Controls; Championship: Galileo #2 seed, Q-finals; IRI: Champions
2005 AZ: #1 Seed, Xerox Creativity; SoCal: Finalist, RadioShack Controls; SVR: Winners, Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technologies"; Championship: Archimedes Semifinals; IRI: Finalist
2007 LA: Finalist; San Diego: Q-finals; CalGames: Finalist || 2008 San Diego: Q-finals; LA: Winners; CalGames: Finalist || 2009 LA: Semifinals; Las Vegas: Q-finals; IRI: #1 Seed, Finalist
2010 AZ: Motorola Quality; LA: Finalist || 2011 SD: Q-finals; LA: Q-finals || 2013 LA: Xerox Creativity, WFFA, Dean's List Finalist || 2014 IE: Q-finals, LA: Finalist, Dean's List Finalist
2016 Ventura: Q-finals, WFFA, Engineering Inspiration
|