Thread: Smaller Nationals = Bigger Regionals?
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2001, 19:46
Elgin Clock's Avatar
Elgin Clock Elgin Clock is offline
updates this status less than FB!
AKA: the one who "will break into your thoughts..."
FRC #0237 (Black Magic)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: H20-Town, Connecticut
Posts: 7,773
Elgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Elgin Clock
Smaller Nationals = Bigger Regionals?
Since the Nats are going to be considerably smaller this year do you think that the regionals are going to be larger? I know my team is thinking about attending more than one regional this year. I know this is the norm for a lot of teams but it is do you think that more teams are going to attend more than one regionals this year in order to qualify for Nats?

FIRST has to realise that by making the Nats smaller, it does not necessarily solve all thier problems!
__________________
The influence of many leads to the individuality of one. - E.C.C. (That's me!!)

Reply With Quote