View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 00:22
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: For what it's worth...

Posted by Lora Knepper.

Other on team #419, Rambots, from UMass Boston / BC High and NASA, Mathsoft, Solidworks, Analog Devices.

Posted on 11/8/2000 4:25 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: For what it's worth... posted by Matt Leese on 11/8/2000 4:03 PM MST:



:And, I'm sorry, if you pick a President based on
:whether or not you get invited to the White House,
:you've got to reevaluate your priorities.

I totally have to agree with Matt on this one. This should NOT be a factor in selecting the leader of our country, even though I do see it as great recognition for FIRST. That said, I think that there are some loopholes in the Electoral College system (especially if Gore loses! sheesh...), but generally the system has worked...and for the most part people are just very very misinformed about the system, something that irks me to no end. (yeah, I'm in American Government and I worked on this election doing exit polls) And you know, I think I'm going to be quiet now b/c I've gotten into far too many political arguments today on only 2 hours of sleep =) So....go Gore (better than the others!) and I'm going to get some sleep before Florida comes through....

~lora



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.