View Single Post
  #78   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2008, 17:20
writchie writchie is offline
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Wally Ritchie
FRC #2152 (Team Daytona)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Daytona Beach, Florida
Posts: 148
writchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond reputewritchie has a reputation beyond repute
Re: NEW 2009 Control System Released

Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrel View Post
I assume you meant 9403 not 9203?

Anyways...my vague point was that it seems a bit odd to use a controller that requires plug in modules for I/O, and these plug in modules require further custom plug in modules to actually interface with the stuff on the robot.

I guess it simulates the research world pretty well, but not the consumer product world.

Fortunately we're a bright bunch of folks and we'll make it work!
Your right - I meant 9403.

The PWM's and servos generally need higher current drivers as well as the power source for the servos. I think their idea is to keep only standard NI components plugged into the chassis with all non-NI parts external.

Yes is this is more like a platform for research/academia but also suited for one-offs and low volume which, after all, is what we are.

There is no question that it's neat hardware. The open issue is how well it can help achieve the mission of first when a hands-on controller is $6K instead of $300.
Reply With Quote